G50
Hi everyone a co-woker use to work on Porsche. I told him of m500 0 fanticy of stuffing a Porsche 5speed tiptronic into my keeper. He but fast, downed that ideal, but he said that he had a g50. I'm really having money troubles, so he said I could make payments. That was right up my alley, so I ask for a price, his reply was don't worry about it.
He sent me pictures, looks good, but he still won't commit to a fixed price. Now business is business, I will not buy it even on payments,without a firm price. What do you all think. Lastly, what would be a good price? Ok,I get to add some more questions. I hear there is allot of trans noise from the g50. Is the a fix, I think Steve C said that he had his trans disassembled, and found nothing. Will sound deading help throughout,even the tunnel. How bad it's the noise? |
Hi
Im not sure what going rate is now for a G50, what type is it? You could call a few Porsche wreckers to see what sort of money they want, you will also need a shifter and rod. My noise issues was that the gearbox was too well mounted and using a non dual mass clutch I agree get a firm price. Steve. |
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k9...c.jpg~original
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k9...g.jpg~original http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k9...v.jpg~original http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k9...6.jpg~original Hi everyone, here is the g50/01 and the 901 0r 902, still can't tell. I see now, how Porsche made their trans better. bigger, stronger, and heavy:o The 901 is going into this gold 1302. I think I will still use the 2110 type one turbo engine I have for it, if I can just get on track. However, that g50 will be my keeper:D wow |
My noise issues was that the gearbox was too well mounted and using a non dual mass clutch
Steve.[/QUOTE] Steve, what is a non dual mas clutch? |
Its a special clutch plate that was used to quieten drive train noises
|
So,it's the not pressure plate? Who makes and sells it,and in what size
|
G50 Porsche clutches are 240 mm, do some reading on Porsche forums, most people get rid of them and put up with the noise
|
Thank You
|
Don't worry about noise, I don't think its noticebly louder then any other trans ;-)
|
Quote:
|
Hmm, interesting question. Actually not really.
Maybe I would have grinded the splines less backwards, but I thought I needed to do that for spacing reasons iirc (?). Reason is I was a little worried when I ran dual disks with it (those have a bigger total spline length/depth), but it turned out afterwards that it holded fine the way it was done. One last thing: With enough time and even more effort I still would like to have the trans even more forward in the car, but thats just from the theoretical aspect of gaining even better center of gravity. In reality I have little complaints about the handling, but things can always be improved upon I suppose :-) |
Hey again, correct me if I am wrong, isn't the transmission as forward as physically possible?
I agree with you on having the transmission as forward as possible, and then with me wanting to couple the trans to a ez-30;and keep the deck in its normal position, will offer its hurdles. |
Yeah,you're correct: it is.
Thats why I commented that it would take considerable time and effort to move it even more forward. I meant: cut the torsion tubes and weld in structural support without making it all extremely heavy and negating the effect you just gained... Sorry, I should have been more clear on that ;-) |
I may have to go with my type IV engine, but no cutting the axle tub.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved