Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carbon Joe
Bill,
Yes I'm going to be making early headlamp rings, are the screws at 5 and 7 for adjustment or mounting? I thought there was only one mounting point.
|
Awesome -- that's going to look sweet with my 911 lenses and other C/F parts.
You're right on the mounting hole -- just one. I want early C/F headlight rings with adjuster screws at 5 and 7 oclock. Sorry to confuse. Here's a full-on clarification on the early rings
There are 3 styles of rings. I got these pictures and info from
www.wolfsburgwest.com. I won't be surprised if there is more to the story...
1. Adjusters at 9 and 12 oclock -- OEM on pre '54 w/ bosch headlights
2. Adjusters at 5 and 7 oclock -- OEM on '54-'62 and pre '54 w/ hella headlights; used with aftermarket "American Assemblies"
3. Adjusters at 2 and 7 oclock -- OEM on '63-'67; used with aftermarket "European Assemblies"
They all have a third hole in a mounting tab at 6 oclock for securing the ring to the fender. There is a nylon sleeve that goes under the tab to keep the tab from bending too far when the screw is tightened.
I recommend you start with the 5 and 7 style. These seem to be the most common aftermarket "
American Assemblies". They are $100/pair, vs. $300/pair for the
"European Assemblies" . I'm modifying mine like the "European" ones based on a tip I got from aircooled.net -- bust the fluted glass out of H4 lamp holder and use 911 fluted lenses. The light output is great with this combo, plus you get a stealth running light. I'll post this setup when it's finished in a couple weeks...
The 2 and 7 style would be needed for those with OEM assemblies from 63-67 or the aftermarket "European" headlight assemblies. Is anyone interested in this style trim ring?
You probably can rule out making the 9 and 12 style since it's so old and odd-ball.
We need to get a good OEM ring for your mold. The aftermarket ones are aren't worthy of carbon fiber -- oval shape is off, rim doesn't go tangent to lens, etc. Does anyone have a good OEM 5 and 7 ring to donate? I'll start looking.
So much for a simple answer...
