GermanLook Forums  

Go Back   GermanLook Forums > General > Project Builds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 29th 2010, 05:39
oasis's Avatar
oasis oasis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: timonium, md usa
Posts: 1,290
Possible project (standard Beetle)

Okay, another possibility has caught my eye. It is a standard Beetle. My experience and previous research has always centered around the Super (1302 and 1303). There is a standard that looks awfully good to me, however. It is an IRS platform.

My very basic question is: What can I do to enhance the handling of a standard?

My searching has me awash with differing ideas that tends to be more technical than what I am looking for up front. I am looking for basic answers. If it surpasses my intimidation level, I may consider the car and will seek detailed suggestions when appropriate.

(If this belongs in "Suspension," I am fine with it being moved. Since this is general and I may add to it as such, I placed it here.)
__________________
(2004-2008): 1971 1302 w/2056
Searching for a new project ...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 29th 2010, 14:54
joeyd63 joeyd63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9
lowering the car will lower the center of gravity and reduce body roll

thats a quick way to improve the handling of any car.

you could just add droped spindles in the front and index the rear torsion bars.

how well do you want it to handle? is this a race car or just a toy?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 29th 2010, 16:28
chug_A_bug's Avatar
chug_A_bug chug_A_bug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada, Ontario,
Posts: 1,179
just did my whole 74 std and bilsteins are KEY same with lowering and urethane bushings all around...
and I nice set of sticky tires will help ALOT, my bug is like it's on rails NOW!!

Chris
__________________
74 Std. GL
08 Vw rabbit
18 WR250R
07 Chevy 3500 Dually
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 30th 2010, 09:29
Wally's Avatar
Wally Wally is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,552
Remove the stock front suspension completely and substitute for a Red9-design (whats their name again) or Mendeola double wishbone front suspension package.

Done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 1st 2010, 21:27
volkdent's Avatar
volkdent volkdent is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Posts: 1,685
Do a Mendeola, it includes sways and with the IRS on the rear you'd be in pretty good shape.

Jason
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights....
1960 VW Bug UBRDUB
Walkaround
1st Drag Run

Dyno Run
Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 2nd 2010, 14:47
oasis's Avatar
oasis oasis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: timonium, md usa
Posts: 1,290
Some quick responses ...

Race car -- no. Toy -- well, I guess, but I would say serious toy. (I did look into the rules for rallying.)

My Super was a serious toy. That was great fun. I can be patient to have things done right rather than just on the quick.

Here in the mid-Atlantic, we have three months where fog, dew, frozen dew, sloppy rain and (of course) snow dominate the weather. I had nice tires on my Super and they were great nine months of the year. During the three bleak months, I found the tires that were closer to stock as being better. That is why I included "rally car" in my description on the other possible project thread. I would probably want to adjust my set-up depending on the season.

Wally and Jason -- sounds simple and effective. That's a combo I always like.

Thanks to all for the responses. There seems to be more standard candidates than Supers right now. We'll see what December brings.
__________________
(2004-2008): 1971 1302 w/2056
Searching for a new project ...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 4th 2010, 02:41
oasis's Avatar
oasis oasis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: timonium, md usa
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally View Post
... or Mendeola double wishbone front suspension package
I just looked at their S2-T1 chassis. My brain is now going at 8,000 RPMs. Wow!
__________________
(2004-2008): 1971 1302 w/2056
Searching for a new project ...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old December 7th 2010, 14:36
Humble's Avatar
Humble Humble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 758
Pricing on the mendeola setup isn't too terrible. I think it was around 3400 for the complete front end, spindle to spindle. Like everyone else says, IRS is key for the rear. The guys at mendeola say they're getting 1+ lateral G on sticky street tires with their S2 chassis design. More food for thought
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old December 7th 2010, 16:05
Wally's Avatar
Wally Wally is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble View Post
. The guys at mendeola say they're getting 1+ lateral G on sticky street tires with their S2 chassis design. More food for thought
Friend of mine over here measured that in his standard beetle as well. IRS, lowered, 7/8,5Jx17 so I am not too impressed with 'just' 1+ G
How much the '+' really is, would make it interesting and if it would really be MUCH better than you can achieve with original parts. For $3400,00 it would have to be imo.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old December 7th 2010, 18:39
ricola's Avatar
ricola ricola is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,137
constant radius 'g' would be more to do with the suspension loaded geometry and what tyres (& temps) are used. For me suspension is there to deal with dynamic changes which are harder to put an absolute number on
__________________
http://www.ricola.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old December 8th 2010, 13:36
evilC's Avatar
evilC evilC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK Where Leics is more
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricola View Post
constant radius 'g' would be more to do with the suspension loaded geometry and what tyres (& temps) are used. For me suspension is there to deal with dynamic changes which are harder to put an absolute number on
Agreed. A slalom test usually sorts out any evil handling motor and you don't even need a Moose!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old December 8th 2010, 16:06
volkdent's Avatar
volkdent volkdent is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Posts: 1,685
Its not even about absolute grip for me either, the feel is very important. It's no fun to have a car that has major grip but doesn't give you confidence. I was always surprised that an old Golf always felt more fun to drive than a similar era Honda even though the numbers said a Honda actually gripped better. I'll take some roll to "feel" a corner sometimes than to have a grippy car that's more on/off twitchy at the limit.

Jason
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights....
1960 VW Bug UBRDUB
Walkaround
1st Drag Run

Dyno Run
Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old December 8th 2010, 18:02
judgie's Avatar
judgie judgie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: northants uk
Posts: 355
not a big fan of either the red nine kit or the bolt on wishbone.
red nine kit turns it into a coil sprung linked front end with all the vehicle wieght being suported by two towers designed to take just a shock abosober.
the wish bone fornt ends dont have long enough wish bones to convince me that they will be any better than a well set up beam front end.
__________________
my race car build galleryhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/1406263...7602662665607/
my web site www.rnjmotorsport.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old December 9th 2010, 04:34
Wally's Avatar
Wally Wally is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by judgie View Post
not a big fan of either the red nine kit or the bolt on wishbone.

the wish bone fornt ends dont have long enough wish bones to convince me that they will be any better than a well set up beam front end.
Very surprised you say that. The wish bones don't have to be that long in a double wishbone set-up for them to work their magic adjusting caster as they move up and down.
I think the Mendeola double wish bone set-up is miles better then the ball-joint bug front suspension.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old December 9th 2010, 10:12
evilC's Avatar
evilC evilC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK Where Leics is more
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally View Post
Very surprised you say that. The wish bones don't have to be that long in a double wishbone set-up for them to work their magic adjusting caster as they move up and down.
I think the Mendeola double wish bone set-up is miles better then the ball-joint bug front suspension.
I agree with Rob. Short wishbones mean that for relatively small movements the geometry can change excessively. Longer wishbones operate over a smaller angular movement keeping camber under greater control. Also the reaction at the pivot points on longer wishbones is much les than with their shorter cousins meaning that flexible pivots like poly bushes have much less to do and the heim joints last longer.

I also agree you Wally, that the Mendeola double wishbone set up is infinitely better than twin trailing arms but also much better than Red9's design.

Clive
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved