944T Rear Brembos on an 84NA hub/disk

[flat]

One other thing, with the Boxster S rotors, the disk-to-hub retaining screws don't line up. Also, last time I checked the Boxster S rotor was about double the cost of a 86T.


Lanner

[matara]

Lanner,

Can you tell us if we should be getting the Boxster S disk with a 67mm height or a 70mm height?

Thanks

Steve

[flat]

I'll try and dig them out this weekend and measure....

[matara]

Any luck finding out which height is should be Lanner?

Thanks

Steve

[flat]

Yup, it's the 67mm ones (2000-2004 Boxster S)

[vdubfund]

Hey
Guys
I am currently running Boxter S rear discs 964 2 pots in the rear
Am also using Lanners spacers

Oh this is on a 64 swing axle bug.
Needs slightly more than the 3mm though. But works great
Using 944 MC outlets are reversed. Rears are fed off the front port and fronts off the rear port.

Dean

[evilC]

Originally Posted by vdubfund

Hey
Guys
I am currently running Boxter S rear discs 964 2 pots in the rear
Am also using Lanners spacers

Oh this is on a 64 swing axle bug.
Needs slightly more than the 3mm though. But works great
Using 944 MC outlets are reversed. Rears are fed off the front port and fronts off the rear port.

Dean

I have easily and successfully added 944T/928S4 calipers to 944/924S N/A arms with 944/924S discs(rotors). The disc thickness is less than ideal but periodic monitoring will ensure that the pads don't wear down too far to pop the pistons. I anticipate fitting 299x24x71 944T/928S4 discs when the pads wear down that should comfortably correct the disc thickness issue. I also expect some shimming to still be required to centre the disc.

The rear ports (closest to the pedal i.e.23mm dia) should feed the front brakes regardless. The front ports i.e. the 19mm dia feeds the rear brakes.