|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
American Racing Wheels
I found a set I like, and did some research and noticed alot of you guys use wheels with 42et or higher, but I notice also most use 16's or bigger.I found a 15x7" rim with a 50et with 6" backspacing.Is there a reason you guys skip over the 15's and go bigger besides just because it fills up the wheel well?
Also would they both fit under the front and rear, because I did see some guys in the readers rides galleries running stock fenders with the wheels tucked in for a stockish look? Again thanks alot guys. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
To get the wheels tucked back under the fenders, some run a narrowed beam. Because, once you get those 55et wheels spaced out from hitting torsion arms, and sway bar while turning, you have to get the wheels back under the fenders.
__________________
1970 T1 W/MassIVe 2913cc RAT/?EFI? w/direct fire (very soon) and 915 trans 1962 SC 1776cc SP 944NA brakes, 993 wheels VKG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ok so 50+et rims in 15inch are a bad idea then I guess, does the same go for the rims with the et in the 40's?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
40et's would be easier to deal with.
__________________
1970 T1 W/MassIVe 2913cc RAT/?EFI? w/direct fire (very soon) and 915 trans 1962 SC 1776cc SP 944NA brakes, 993 wheels VKG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
less measuring i take it?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Thinner spacers, (if needed at all) depending on spindles, and hubs used.
__________________
1970 T1 W/MassIVe 2913cc RAT/?EFI? w/direct fire (very soon) and 915 trans 1962 SC 1776cc SP 944NA brakes, 993 wheels VKG |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|