![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
To keep with your example: Porsche only switched to watercooling because of environmental (read: noise, emission) reasons, not for longlivity reasons. I think they made some extremely potent aircooled engines, proving to us that watercooling is not necessary to keep 'long term reliability'. I kinda followed porsche's idea's and can report they were right ![]() If anyone really feels watercooling is engineering progress (there is certainly a point there), why don't they use the waterboxer as the next step? Subaru, Honda, Alfa engines all seem to be used solely to get a bit more power from OEM engines, so they didn't need to think about designing/tuning that part (the engine) themselves... Calling it 'engineering progress' afterwards is just wrong therefore imo. But I love all of you guys as fellow gearheads anyways, so don't sweat it ![]() Walter |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|