![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Now that I've seen the picture, it may be possible to use a 993 Biturbo caliper and mount it leading rather than trailing and having to modify the crossover tube.
With this design, you could mount the caliper like the Franklin's design. Just my 2c Sandeep |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
derr... you're right.
I think I might still use the disc spindles, so I can bolt the caliper straight to it, and eliminate the additional variable of a caliper adapter... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
No current VW projects 54 Chevy wagon LS2 AWD 56 Chevy Panel "Lost Cause" VKG Bastage child |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Leading vs Trailing .... good question
Not sure if one is better than the other Sandeep |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: leading vs trailing.
It makes no difference at all. The caliper clamps the disk and creates a moment (torque). Torque= FORCE x DISTANCE. The FORCE is the clamping force of the caliper, and the DISTANCE is just the radius of the disk. Therefore position doesn't make a difference. Just make sure you can bleed the caliper when positioned. I've considered mounting a caliper on the bottom, in order to lower the centre of gravity of a car. The problem is bleeding, but then I was considering making a caliper mount with two sets of 'ears'. One to position the caliper in the bottom position, and the second to move the caliper to the side for bleeding purposes. Maybe one day when I have more time... Lanner |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|