![]() |
| ||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which will give you the most long-term bang for your buck! | |||
| air-cooled stock |
|
4 | 16.00% |
| air-cooled High Output |
|
8 | 32.00% |
| water-cooled conversion |
|
13 | 52.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
while i debated many options during the build of my bug, i went HO air to help keep the hobby alive. i built a bug because i wanted a bug and all of the things that come with the aircooled family. i went TIV for torque and long term reliability.
i see absolutely nothing wrong with the other options. they all have their pros and cons. mine was purely a decision of staying true to aircooled for that car. now my T3 Vanagon is another thing. not sure yet what direction i will go there. it is a budget beater project so the "deal" will greatly determine the result. thinking EJ25 or EJ22 Subaru conversion though. rotary is appealing just for something different for me. not a great torque engine for a van though. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've seen old school mini's with a Suzuki Hayabusa motor....200 stock hp.....15,000 rpm redline....sky's the limit for turbo and aftermarket parts for it. It's like the Civic of the motorcycle world....turbo those motors push some NASTY numbers....
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|