![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
400hp in a bug is not in the same ballpark as 400hp in a Chevvy. Without boost (around 215hp) my bug is very quick and with the turbo going full blast its plain scary and almost undriveable on the streets.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Its a shame that 1/7th of our lives is spent on Mondays!!! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Axl,
If you are already going to build a tube frame, why not look into using an entire Subaru drivetrain? AWD Bug would be sweet even if it was a front mount job. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought about it , but I would want to keep the engine in the back , and I don't know about making it all work . I think I will keeo it as I originally planned .Axl .
__________________
Its a shame that 1/7th of our lives is spent on Mondays!!! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looking for some ideas...
I have a few ideas I'd like to toss around for getting my coolant from the front to the back. Ahem...
1. Run round tubing inside the main tunnel. Send and return. Pro- Neat/cleaner look, practical since everything else is in the tunnel Con- Tight space, and I havn't figure out a good way around the rear torsion. 2. Run one pipe inside the tunnel and one on the passenger side. (right next the tunnel) Pro- Not as clean, but clean. Con- A big hump on the passenger side of the tunnel, and the rear torsion. 3. Square OR round tubing under the car. Pro- More room than the tunnel. Con- Might limit ground clearance, and I'm a little uneasy about the pipes under the car. 4. Heater channels. Pro- Clean! I can check for rust while I've got them open. Con- A lot more work. I'm thinking either 1-1/2 or 1-3/4 diameter. The radiator inlet and outlet are 1-3/4. The engine I don't have yet. I can always get an adaptor to a smaller diameter for the rad or weld a smaller diameter pipe on it. (I love TIG ) As for material, Aluminum, Stainless, and Carbon Steel are all options. But the cost might be a limiting factor. I have the capibility of welding all. I kinda want to say away from copper. Question... Would a smaller diameter pipe put a strain on the water pump by restricting the volume of water it can move? I'm an aircooled guy. I'm sure I missed a few pros and a cons, But I've just gone blank on some of them. And please excuse all spelling errors. Let me know guys. I'd sure love to have another perspective on this.
__________________
Mike '04 R32 Tornado Red '02 New Beetle TDI - Daily driver '64 Ghia - Project!!-Subaru EJ20T, MS/EDIS, 993 brakes, 914 Tranny... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh my goodness, I can't believe I, Mr. Technoklutz, am going to make a suggestion about a water-cooled conversion ... but here goes.
Make sure regardless of whatever method you choose and whatever material is being used you employ mandrel bends. An inch and a half or an inch and three-quarters won't mean squat if you have bends pinching off at seven-eighths in places. And now, back to the experts.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
theres pics on my site mikey that show how to run it down the tunnel, which is what i did.
1.5-1.75 inch pipe seems excessive in my mind. I mean, the subaru has like a 1 inch inside diameter outlet! and maybe 1.25 inlet. Just trying to save you guys some room, and limit the amount of coolant u are going to need, and trust me, its ALOT. -Ryan
__________________
www.subynotch.com |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|