![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
hey dude.
thanks for that. how does that calculation work with twin or 4 piston calipers compared to single sliders? i have just worked this out but i dunno if its right as the front calipers are 2 piston, and the rears single piston: 944 master cylinder: 40/23 = 36/19 1.74 = 1.89 bug master cylinder: 40/19 = 36/19 2.11 = 1.89 my maths is rubbish, i dunno how to change that to a ratio :S mabbo |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Your maths is rubbish You have factored in the diameter not the area . you can discount pi in the calculation as it is a comparison and features on both sides of the equation therefore your comparison should read:944 master cylinder 4 (2 pistons each side) x 1600 (40 squared)/529 (23 squared) = 12.10 2 (1 piston each side) x 1296 (36 squared)/361 (19 squared) = 7.18 Therefore the front rear ratio is 12.1/7.18:1 i.e 1.69:1 bug m/c 4 x 1600/361 = 17.7 12 x 296/361 = 7.18 Therefore the ratio is 17.7/7.18:1 i.e. 2.47:1 Joe Amato's figures are wrong insofar as they don't take into account the total piston area of the caliper. The hydraulic fluid is acting on both pistons simultaneously of a 2 pot caliper evilC |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
dude
cheers for that ![]() so, what sort of ratio should i be aiming for? would you just stick with the stock bug master cylinder? its a street car, there are loadsa people using the empi kit with stock master cylinder id imagine - the bias must be acceptable? if the reason my pedal was 2 soft wasnt because of the 19mm bore (im sure it wasnt), it must have been because of a faulty master cylinder... mabbo |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|