![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Bruce, that is EXACTLY what i meant! Not sure if possible with new arms from Lee, but if there would be a way to incorporate the extension, then that would make it an extra selling point and I would want a set now as I am contemplating extension possibilities at the moment.
The higher up mounting on the inside is theoretically a sound alternative, but the arm is already on the high hole of the mounting (as original) with '74-> suspension and higher is fysically not possible there.. Whats the weight difference with stock arms Lee? Seems like it would be hard to shed weight on the original design, but would be happy to be proven wrong of course! It would be nice if the extra weight of the extension(s) - which would be heavy - could be made up some by lighter arms! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
A pic from my first front suspension
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
wally you cant believe the weight difference between the two moly is so light . so what we need is higher ball joint end ????
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yep! I have some 9cm clearence towards my 18"wheels from underside ball-joint to wheel rim. I think 2 inches higher will fit any other wheel, make it worth the trouble and be effective enough?
BTW, I really like light-weight in suspension components!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
ill see what we can do at this stage thanks guys for all the input.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|
|